Rapid Drug-likeness Analysis
Xichang Bio boasts extensive expertise in drug‑likeness assessment, protein engineering, candidate molecule design and expression, and in vitro efficacy evaluation for a wide range of novel molecular entities, including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and ADCs. This capability enables seamless integration between early‑stage drug discovery and CMC development, facilitating the advancement of superior candidates into the next phase of development.
Xichang Bio boasts extensive expertise in drug‑likeness assessment, protein engineering, candidate molecule design and expression, and in vitro efficacy evaluation for a wide range of novel molecular entities, including monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and ADCs. This capability enables seamless integration between early‑stage drug discovery and CMC development, facilitating the advancement of superior candidates into the next phase of development.
Core Technological Advantages
Comprehensive Assessment System
Physicochemical characterization: Antibody aggregation propensity, charge heterogeneity, and thermal stability (with a Tm value > 70°C being preferred) are assessed using techniques such as SEC-HPLC, CE-SDS, and DLS.
Immunogenicity Prediction: By integrating AI algorithms with in vitro T-cell activation assays, we predict and mitigate the risk of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) for humanized antibodies.
Functional activity validation: SPR/BLI assays for affinity determination (KD in the pM range), cell‑killing and blocking assays, and in vivo efficacy studies using PDX models and humanized mice—comprehensive multi‑dimensional evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.
Developability Assessment: Optimization of expression vectors and host cells (CHO/HEK293) to achieve high‑titer (>5 g/L) and stable large‑scale production.
Rational Design Optimization
Enhanced stability: By introducing site-directed mutations or engineering glycosylation, the antibody’s resistance to proteolytic degradation and its serum half-life are improved.
Reducing aggregation risk: substituting hydrophobic residues and optimizing the charge distribution in the CDR regions to ensure that the monomeric form accounts for >95% of the formulation.
Humanized fine-tuning: Employing a CDR grafting plus framework region optimization strategy, this approach preserves biological activity while reducing the incidence of HAMA (human anti‑mouse antibody) responses to below 5%.
Service Content
Serial number | Molecular characteristics | Assessment methods |
1 | Sequence and Structural Assessment | In Silico Method |
2 | Molecular size and purity | SEC-HPLC method |
3 | Molecular size and purity | Recovery of the CE-SDS method |
4 | Molecular size and purity | Non-reducing CE-SDS method |
5 | Isoelectric point | iCIEF method |
6 | Charge purity | iCIEF method |
7 | Charge purity | CEX-HPLC method |
8 | Mass spectrometry molecular weight | RP-MS method |
9 | Post-translational modification | RP-MS/MS method |
10 | Solubility | PEG method |
11 | Thermal stability (Tm/Tagg) | UNCle Law |
12 | Colloidal stability (kD) | UNCle Law |
13 | Particle size | UNCle Law |
14 | Self-interaction | AC-SINS method |
15 | Nonspecific binding | BVP method |
16 | Nonspecific binding | Off-target cell assay |
17 | Binds to proteins of the same family | BLI method/ELISA method |
18 | Binding of proteins from different species | BLI method/ELISA method |
19 | PK-related features | Heparin column method |
20 | Antigen affinity | BLI method |
21 | Biological activity | Cell method |
22 | Fc Function Assessment | BLI method (optional for different receptors) |
23 | ADCC/CDC/ADCP | Cell method |
24 | Plasma/Serum Stability | Cell method |
25 | Endocytosis | Cell method |
26 | Bystander effect of harm | Cell method |
27 | Cell cycle arrest | FACS method |
28 | Forced degradation stability | High temperature, light exposure, strong oxidizing agents, high pH, low pH, freeze–thaw cycles, and shaking—select as needed. |
Serial number | Quality Research | Analytical method | |
1 | Variable-temperature mass spectrometry molecular weight analysis | RP-MS method | |
2 | Non-variant mass spectrometry molecular weight analysis | SEC-MS method | |
3 | Complete Amino Acid Sequence Analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
4 | Post-translational modification analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
5 | Extinction Coefficient Analysis | RP-HPLC-FLD method | |
6 | Identification of N-glycosylation sites | RP-MS/MS method | |
7 | Analysis of N-glycosylation composition | HILIC-FLD method | |
8 | Sialic Acid Content Analysis | RP-HPLC-FLD method | |
9 | Free thiol analysis | Ellman Assay method | |
10 | Disulfide Bond Analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
11 | Secondary/Tertiary Structure Analysis | Circular dichroism spectroscopy | |
12 | Tertiary structure | Protein autofluorescence scanning method | |
13 | Dual-antibody mismatch analysis | (iCIEF or HIC) /CE, etc. | |
14 | Sequence Variant Analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
15 | Collection and Identification of Acid–Base Peaks | CEX-HPLC/RP-MS, etc. | |
16 | Collection and Identification of Polymer Fragments | SEC-HPLC/RP-MS, etc. | |
17 | Collection and Identification of DAR Heteromers | HIC-HPLC, RP-MS, etc. | |
18 | Qualitative Analysis of High-Risk HCPs | RP-MS/MS method | |
19 | Quantitative Analysis of High-Risk HCPs | RP-MS/MS method | |
20 | HCP Coverage Analysis | 2D-WB method | |
21 | HCP Coverage Analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
22 | Analysis of Tuan degradation products | RP-HPLC-CAD method | |
23 | Average DAR Value Analysis | HIC or RP method | |
24 | DAR Value Distribution Analysis | HIC or RP method | |
25 | Coupling Site Analysis | RP-MS/MS method | |
26 | Polymeric form identification | SEC-MALS method | |
Documentary materials